{"id":115467,"date":"2024-02-22T12:50:59","date_gmt":"2024-02-22T09:50:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/coinmuhendisi.com\/blog\/?p=115467"},"modified":"2024-02-22T12:50:59","modified_gmt":"2024-02-22T09:50:59","slug":"teksas-sirketi-kuzey-bolge-mahkemesinde-sece-dava-acti","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/coinmuhendisi.com\/blog\/teksas-sirketi-kuzey-bolge-mahkemesinde-sece-dava-acti\/","title":{"rendered":"Teksas \u015eirketi , Kuzey B\u00f6lge Mahkemesinde Sec’e Dava A\u00e7t\u0131 !"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hen\u00fcz ba\u015flat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f bir kripto borsas\u0131 i\u00e7in haz\u0131rl\u0131k yapan Teksas \u015firketi, Menkul<\/strong> K\u0131ymetler<\/strong> Ticareti<\/strong> su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n\u0131 engelleme umuduyla Texas<\/strong> Kripto<\/strong> \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck<\/strong> \u0130ttifak\u0131<\/strong> ile g\u00fc\u00e7lerini birle\u015ftirdi.<\/p>\n

The Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas (CFAT)<\/strong> ve dijital varl\u0131k \u015firketi Lejilex<\/strong>, ABD Menkul K\u0131ymetler ve Borsa Komisyonu<\/a>‘na (SEC<\/strong>) dava a\u00e7t\u0131 ve mahkemenin ikincil piyasada sat\u0131lan dijital varl\u0131klar\u0131n durumu hakk\u0131nda karar vermesini talep ediyor.<\/p>\n

CFAT<\/strong> ve Lejilex<\/strong>, Lejilex’in<\/strong> Legit<\/strong>.Exchange<\/strong> adl\u0131 bir kripto borsas\u0131<\/a> ba\u015flatma plan\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilen Mike<\/strong> Wawszczak’\u0131n<\/strong> bir avukat ve Alliance<\/strong> DAO’nun<\/strong> genel dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 oldu\u011fu, LinkedIn profiline g\u00f6re, 21 \u015eubat’ta Fort<\/strong> Worth’taki<\/strong> Kuzey Teksas B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi’nde SEC’e<\/strong> kar\u015f\u0131 dava a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n

Dava, Declaratory<\/strong> Judgment<\/strong> Act<\/strong> ve 2007<\/strong> y\u0131l\u0131nda bir \u00f6rnek olarak g\u00f6sterilen bir dava ile bir su\u00e7lama ile SEC’e<\/strong> kar\u015f\u0131 bir iddia ortaya koyuyor. Davac\u0131lar, mahkemeden birka\u00e7 karar istiyorlar, bunlar aras\u0131nda:<\/p>\n

“a. LEJILEX’in Legit.Exchange arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla kolayla\u015ft\u0131rmay\u0131 planlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi dijital varl\u0131klar\u0131n ikincil piyasa sat\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n, 1934 Menkul K\u0131ymetler Borsas\u0131 Kanunu ve 1933 Menkul K\u0131ymetler Kanunu’nda tan\u0131mlanan \u015fekilde menkul k\u0131ymet sat\u0131\u015flar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan edin.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Ayr\u0131ca, mahkemeden Legit.Exchange’<\/strong>in kay\u0131tl\u0131 olmayan bir menkul k\u0131ymet borsas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve Lejilex’in borsay\u0131 i\u015fletmesiyle kay\u0131tl\u0131 olmayan bir arac\u0131 veya takas kurulu\u015fu olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ilan etmesini istiyorlar.<\/p>\n

\"Teksas
Lejilex’in SEC’e kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava. Kaynak: PACER<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Davac\u0131lar, “SEC’in son d\u00f6nemdeki cezai i\u015flemlerinin, neredeyse t\u00fcm dijital varl\u0131k i\u015flemlerinin federal menkul k\u0131ymetler yasalar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ‘yat\u0131r\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri’ i\u00e7erdi\u011fi yeni ve orijinal bir pozisyonu benimsedi\u011fini”<\/strong> savundular.<\/p>\n

Devam\u0131nda, “Bu pozisyon, dijital varl\u0131k end\u00fcstrisindeki kanunlara uygun kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131, SEC’in kendi yetkisinin abart\u0131l\u0131 anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131na uyum sa\u011flamad\u0131klar\u0131 i\u00e7in SEC’in cezai i\u015flemlerine maruz kalma riskiyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya b\u0131rakmaktad\u0131r”<\/strong> dedi. \u015eikayet \u015f\u00f6yle devam etti:<\/p>\n

“End\u00fcstri kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcrekli yalvarmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen, SEC yeni pozisyonunu a\u00e7\u0131klayan herhangi bir belirli d\u00fczenleme yay\u0131nlamaktan ka\u00e7\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r, ki bu da ajans\u0131 gerekli gerek\u00e7eleri fark\u0131ndal\u0131k ve yorum yapma kural\u0131 olu\u015fturmak suretiyle test etmeye zorlayacakt\u0131r.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Lejilex<\/strong>, Legit<\/strong>.Exchange’i<\/strong> bir m\u00fc\u015fteri hesab\u0131 bulunmayan bir dijital varl\u0131k ticaret platformu olarak tan\u0131mlad\u0131. Kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n birbirleriyle ticaret yapmalar\u0131na izin vermek i\u00e7in ak\u0131ll\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler kullan\u0131yor. Kullan\u0131c\u0131lar birbirlerinin kimliklerini asla bilmeyecekler. Lejilex<\/strong>, hangi varl\u0131klar\u0131n ticaretine izin verilece\u011fini kontrol edecek ve \u00fccret kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda do\u011frulama gibi i\u015flevleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirecek, ancak kullan\u0131c\u0131 varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 saklamayacakt\u0131r. Web sitesinde \u015firketin Legit<\/strong>.Exchange’i<\/strong> y\u0131l sonuna kadar ba\u015flatmay\u0131 planlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtiliyordu.<\/p>\n

\n

So this is huge. Today, @LEJILEX<\/a> and the Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas (CFAT) sued the SEC seeking a declaration that \u201csecondary-market sales of digital assets like the ones that LEJILEX intends to facilitate through the https:\/\/t.co\/FrN5OiTwYN<\/a> are not sales of securities.\u201d\u2026<\/p>\n

— Amanda Tuminelli (@amandatums) February 21, 2024<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n